Harvest Returns vs Steward

Harvest Returns Overview

Harvest Returns is best suited for investors who want accredited investors seeking exposure to agricultural assets with favorable fee structures; those willing to accept illiquidity for mission-aligned farmland investing; investors comfortable with alternative asset classes outside traditional securities markets. Founded in 2016 and headquartered in Fort Worth, TX, Harvest Returns manages $30 million raised (as of April 2023) in assets.

With a minimum investment of $5K, Harvest Returns offers some investments open to non-accredited investors. The platform does not currently offer a secondary market and requires manual investment selection.

Key Strengths:

• No annual fees or management fees charged to investors
• Low minimum investment ($5,000) compared to many alternative investments
• Diversified agricultural portfolio including farmland, timberland, livestock, specialty crops, and agritech
• Strong historical returns averaging 9.8% annually on private credit offerings since 2019

Key Drawbacks:

• Illiquid investments with no secondary market to sell shares
• Requires accreditation for most deals (some Rule 506b exceptions)
• No mobile app for portfolio management or monitoring

---

Steward Overview

Steward is best suited for investors who want impact-focused investors seeking exposure to sustainable agriculture with moderate liquidity needs and modest capital ($100+). Best suited for those comfortable with 4-6 year project commitments or seeking shorter-term bridge financing options. Ideal for investors who value environmental/regenerative farming practices and want retail access to agricultural lending.. Founded in 2016 and headquartered in Maryland, USA, Steward has built a growing investor base.

With a minimum investment of $100, Steward offers some investments open to non-accredited investors. The platform does not currently offer a secondary market and requires manual investment selection.

Key Strengths:

• Low minimum investment of $100 allows retail participation in agricultural lending
• No fees charged to lenders - transparent fee structure where borrowers cover servicing
• Competitive fixed returns: 7.5% annual for diversified Steward Regenerative Capital pool with monthly payments
• Founder has proven fintech/real estate crowdfunding track record (Fundrise co-founder)

Key Drawbacks:

• Limited operating history - founded 2016, relatively young platform for agricultural lending
• No dedicated mobile app - web-only access limits convenience for active monitoring
• Rule 506(b) offering means limited marketing and smaller investor base

---

Head-to-Head Comparison

Fees & Costs

Harvest Returns carries a fee rating of 5.0/5, with fees structured as: No annual fees charged to investors. Steward scores 4.8/5 on fees, charging: 0.5% servicing fee (charged to borrowers, not lenders).

Edge: Harvest Returns. Lower cost structure gives investors more of their returns.

Minimum Investment

Harvest Returns requires $5K to get started, while Steward requires $100. Steward's lower minimum makes it more accessible for new investors.

Edge: Steward. Lower barrier to entry.

Accreditation Requirements

Harvest Returns partially requires accreditation. Steward partially requires accreditation.

Edge: Tie. Similar accreditation requirements.

Liquidity

Harvest Returns offers illiquid investments. Steward provides semi-liquid investments.

Edge: Tie. Similar liquidity profiles.

Ease of Use

Harvest Returns scores 3.2/5 for ease of use. Steward scores 3.2/5.

Edge: Tie. Both platforms offer solid user experiences.

Transparency

Harvest Returns earns a 3.5/5 transparency rating. Steward scores 2.8/5.

Edge: Harvest Returns. More transparent reporting and disclosures.

---

Who Should Choose Harvest Returns?

Harvest Returns is the better choice if you:

• Are comfortable with a $5K minimum investment
• Meet accredited investor requirements and want premium deal flow
• Want exposure to diversified real estate portfolios
• Prefer to hand-pick your investments

Who Should Choose Steward?

Steward is the better choice if you:

• Want to start investing with a low minimum
• Meet accredited investor requirements and want institutional-quality deals
• Are interested in farmland, private credit as an asset class
• Prefer to hand-pick your investments

---

Verdict

Winner: Harvest Returns. With 3.6/5 overall rating versus Steward's 3.6/5, Harvest Returns edges ahead with better fees. That said, Steward may be the better fit if you specifically need impact-focused investors seeking exposure to sustainable agriculture with modera.

For most investors exploring alternatives, we recommend starting with Harvest Returns — but consider your specific goals before committing.

---

FAQ

Is Harvest Returns or Steward better for beginners?

Steward is generally more beginner-friendly with its $100 minimum investment compared to Harvest Returns's $5K.

Can I use both Harvest Returns and Steward?

Yes. Many alternative investment portfolios benefit from diversification across platforms. Harvest Returns and Steward overlap in some asset classes but may offer different deal structures, fee models, and investment approaches.

Which platform has better returns?

Historical returns vary by specific investment and time period. Both have similar ratings, but past performance doesn't guarantee future results. Both platforms provide different risk-return profiles depending on the specific offerings you choose.

Are Harvest Returns and Steward safe?

Both platforms are legitimate, regulated investment services. Harvest Returns is regulated by SEC (private placement syndications under Regulation D), FINRA (via broker-dealer partner North Capital Private Securities). Steward is regulated by SEC Rule 506(b) - Regulation D exempt offering. As with all alternative investments, there is inherent risk — these are generally illiquid, long-term investments and not FDIC insured.