CrowdStreet vs RealtyMogul
Side-by-side comparison to help you decide which platform is right for your portfolio.
| Feature | CrowdStreet | RealtyMogul |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating | 2.2 | 3.7✓ |
| Min. Investment | $25K | $5K✓ |
| Fee Rating | 3.5✓ | 3.0 |
| Liquidity | Illiquid | Illiquid |
| Accreditation | Required | Partial |
| Ease of Use | 3.2 | 3.5✓ |
| Transparency | 1.8 | 4.0✓ |
| Secondary Market | No | No |
| Mobile App | No | No |
CrowdStreet Overview
CrowdStreet is best suited for investors who want accredited investors seeking diversified private market exposure (real estate, PE, private credit, venture) with substantial capital ($25K-$100K+ per deal) and long holding periods (5-10+ years); investors comfortable with illiquid investments and willing to accept risk of loss. Founded in 2012 and headquartered in Austin, Texas, CrowdStreet manages $4.4B+ (as of July 2025 in commercial real estate alone) in assets.
With a minimum investment of $25K, CrowdStreet requires accredited investor status. The platform does not currently offer a secondary market and requires manual investment selection.
Key Strengths:
- Large volume of curated real estate deals with rigorous vetting (only 2% of applicants approved)
- Registered broker-dealer with FINRA and SIPC protection since 2023
- Expanding into multiple asset classes (private equity, private credit, venture) beyond real estate
- No account setup fees; no direct platform fees for marketplace investments
Key Drawbacks:
- High accreditation barrier ($200K+ annual income or $1M net worth required)
- High minimum investment ($25K+, some deals require up to $100K)
- Extremely illiquid; no secondary market for exit before project completion
RealtyMogul Overview
RealtyMogul is best suited for investors who want accredited and non-accredited investors seeking diversified commercial real estate exposure with low minimum investments and regular income distributions, balanced with illiquidity and moderate risk tolerance.. The platform, RealtyMogul has built a growing investor base.
With a minimum investment of $5K, RealtyMogul offers some investments open to non-accredited investors. The platform does not currently offer a secondary market and requires manual investment selection.
Key Strengths:
- Low minimum investment of $5,000 for REITs makes commercial real estate accessible to non-accredited investors
- Strong due diligence process; multiple reviewers noted RealtyMogul has 'best due diligence in the business'
- Non-accredited investor eligibility for REIT offerings with reasonable limitation (10% of income/net worth)
- Long track record with 234 realized investments as of October 2024 showing 18.1% realized IRR
Key Drawbacks:
- Completely illiquid investments with no secondary market for selling positions
- Mixed investor reviews with some reporting only 1 of 3 deals performing as projected
- Some investors reported deals had no returns or lost money completely
Head-to-Head Comparison
Fees & Costs
CrowdStreet carries a fee rating of 3.5/5, with fees structured as: 0.25% to 2.5% (Private Managed Accounts via CrowdStreet Advisors); None for marketplace investments; Performance: 2% to 5% (sponsor fees passed to investors, varies by project). RealtyMogul scores 3.0/5 on fees, charging: Income REIT: 1% annual; Apartment Growth REIT: 1.25% annual.
Edge: CrowdStreet. Lower cost structure gives investors more of their returns.
Minimum Investment
CrowdStreet requires $25K to get started, while RealtyMogul requires $5K. RealtyMogul's lower minimum makes it more accessible for new investors.
Edge: RealtyMogul. Lower barrier to entry.
Accreditation Requirements
CrowdStreet requires accreditation. RealtyMogul partially requires accreditation.
Edge: Tie. Similar accreditation requirements.
Liquidity
CrowdStreet offers illiquid investments. RealtyMogul provides illiquid investments.
Edge: Tie. Similar liquidity profiles.
Ease of Use & Platform Experience
CrowdStreet scores 3.2/5 for ease of use. RealtyMogul scores 3.5/5.
Edge: RealtyMogul. Better overall user experience.
Transparency & Reporting
CrowdStreet earns a 1.8/5 transparency rating. RealtyMogul scores 4.0/5.
Edge: RealtyMogul. More transparent reporting and disclosures.
Who Should Choose CrowdStreet?
CrowdStreet is the better choice if you:
- Are comfortable with a $25K minimum investment
- Meet accredited investor requirements and want premium deal flow
- Want exposure to diversified real estate portfolios
- Prefer to hand-pick your investments
Who Should Choose RealtyMogul?
RealtyMogul is the better choice if you:
- Are comfortable with a $5K minimum investment
- Meet accredited investor requirements and want institutional-quality deals
- Want exposure to specific real estate deals or projects
- Prefer to hand-pick your investments
Verdict
Winner: RealtyMogul. With 3.7/5 overall rating versus CrowdStreet's 2.2/5, RealtyMogul edges ahead with a lower minimum investment and a stronger overall package. That said, CrowdStreet may be the better fit if you specifically need accredited investors seeking diversified private market exposure (real estate.
For most investors exploring alternatives, we recommend starting with RealtyMogul — but consider your specific goals before committing.
FAQ
Is CrowdStreet or RealtyMogul better for beginners?
RealtyMogul is generally more beginner-friendly with its $5K minimum investment compared to CrowdStreet's $25K.
Can I use both CrowdStreet and RealtyMogul?
Yes. Many alternative investment portfolios benefit from diversification across platforms. CrowdStreet and RealtyMogul overlap in some asset classes but may offer different deal structures, fee models, and investment approaches.
Which platform has better returns?
Historical returns vary by specific investment and time period. CrowdStreet has a lower overall rating, but past performance doesn't guarantee future results. Both platforms provide different risk-return profiles depending on the specific offerings you choose.
Are CrowdStreet and RealtyMogul safe?
Both platforms are legitimate, regulated investment services. CrowdStreet is regulated by SEC (CrowdStreet Advisors registered investment advisor), FINRA (CrowdStreet Capital registered broker-dealer), SIPC. RealtyMogul is regulated by SEC. As with all alternative investments, there is inherent risk — these are generally illiquid, long-term investments and not FDIC insured.
CrowdStreet Asset Classes
RealtyMogul Asset Classes
CrowdStreet
Pros
- +Large volume of curated real estate deals with rigorous vetting (only 2% of applicants approved)
- +Registered broker-dealer with FINRA and SIPC protection since 2023
- +Expanding into multiple asset classes (private equity, private credit, venture) beyond real estate
- +No account setup fees; no direct platform fees for marketplace investments
Cons
- −High accreditation barrier ($200K+ annual income or $1M net worth required)
- −High minimum investment ($25K+, some deals require up to $100K)
- −Extremely illiquid; no secondary market for exit before project completion
- −Over 50% of promoted investments failed to meet target returns (WSJ analysis)
RealtyMogul
Pros
- +Low minimum investment of $5,000 for REITs makes commercial real estate accessible to non-accredited investors
- +Strong due diligence process; multiple reviewers noted RealtyMogul has 'best due diligence in the business'
- +Non-accredited investor eligibility for REIT offerings with reasonable limitation (10% of income/net worth)
- +Long track record with 234 realized investments as of October 2024 showing 18.1% realized IRR
Cons
- −Completely illiquid investments with no secondary market for selling positions
- −Mixed investor reviews with some reporting only 1 of 3 deals performing as projected
- −Some investors reported deals had no returns or lost money completely
- −Additional fees beyond management including up to 2% disposition fee and up to 3% organization expenses
Disclaimer: ModernAlts is an independent research platform. We may receive compensation from platforms we review. Nothing on this site constitutes investment, legal, or tax advice. Alternative investments involve risk including possible loss of principal. Past performance is not indicative of future results.