Concreit vs Groundfloor
Side-by-side comparison to help you decide which platform is right for your portfolio.
| Feature | Concreit | Groundfloor |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating | 3.5 | 4.2✓ |
| Min. Investment | $1✓ | $10 |
| Fee Rating | 2.8 | 4.5✓ |
| Liquidity | Illiquid | Semi-liquid✓ |
| Accreditation | Open to All | Open to All |
| Ease of Use | 4.0 | 4.3✓ |
| Transparency | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Secondary Market | No | No |
| Mobile App | Yes | Yes |
Groundfloor Overview
Groundfloor is best suited for investors who want non-accredited investors seeking short-term, high-yield real estate debt investments with low barriers to entry and automated portfolio management capabilities.. Founded in 2013, Groundfloor manages $2.2 billion+ lent out as of January 2026 in assets.
With a minimum investment of $10, Groundfloor is open to all investors regardless of accreditation status. The platform does not currently offer a secondary market and supports auto-invest features.
Key Strengths:
- Very low minimum investment ($10) makes it accessible to all investors
- No accreditation required - open to non-accredited investors
- SEC-qualified Regulation A offering provides regulatory oversight
- Strong historical returns averaging 10% annualized since 2013
Key Drawbacks:
- Illiquid investment with limited secondary market
- Loss ratio of less than 1% indicates real default risk exists
- Flywheel Portfolio charges 1.00% management fee on disbursements
Concreit Overview
Concreit is best suited for investors who want non-accredited investors seeking passive real estate exposure through a regulated platform with low minimums and weekly dividend income, willing to accept illiquidity. Founded in 2018 and headquartered in Seattle, Washington, Concreit manages Not publicly disclosed in assets.
With a minimum investment of $1, Concreit is open to all investors regardless of accreditation status. The platform does not currently offer a secondary market and supports auto-invest features.
Key Strengths:
- Extremely low minimum investment ($1 to start)
- Weekly dividend payouts (up to 6.6% annual yield)
- Non-accredited investors can participate
- Mobile-first, user-friendly app with live chat support
Key Drawbacks:
- Fully illiquid investment with 2-4 week redemption timeline
- No secondary market for trading shares
- Lower returns compared to alternatives (6-7% vs 8-10%+ elsewhere)
Head-to-Head Comparison
Fees & Costs
Groundfloor carries a fee rating of 4.5/5, with fees structured as: 0.50%-1.00% on Flywheel Portfolio (assessed at disbursement). Concreit scores 2.8/5 on fees, charging: 1% for portfolios over $5,000; $5/month for portfolios under $5,000; Included in management fee; Performance: None.
Edge: Groundfloor. Lower cost structure gives investors more of their returns.
Minimum Investment
Groundfloor requires $10 to get started, while Concreit requires $1. Concreit's lower minimum makes it more accessible for new investors.
Edge: Concreit. Lower barrier to entry.
Accreditation Requirements
Groundfloor does not require accreditation. Concreit does not require accreditation.
Edge: Tie. Similar accreditation requirements.
Liquidity
Groundfloor offers semi-liquid investments. Concreit provides illiquid investments.
Edge: Tie. Similar liquidity profiles.
Ease of Use
Groundfloor scores 4.3/5 for ease of use and offers a mobile app. Concreit scores 4.0/5 and also has a mobile app.
Edge: Groundfloor. Better overall user experience.
Transparency
Groundfloor earns a 4.0/5 transparency rating. Concreit scores 4.0/5.
Edge: Tie. Both platforms provide comparable transparency.
Who Should Choose Groundfloor?
Groundfloor is the better choice if you:
- Want to start investing with a low minimum
- Are a non-accredited investor looking for access to alternatives
- Want exposure to diversified real estate portfolios
- Prefer a hands-off, auto-invest approach
Who Should Choose Concreit?
Concreit is the better choice if you:
- Want to start investing with a low minimum
- Are a non-accredited investor looking for access to alternatives
- Want exposure to specific real estate deals or projects
- Prefer a hands-off, auto-invest approach
Verdict
Winner: Groundfloor. With 4.2/5 overall rating versus Concreit's 3.5/5, Groundfloor edges ahead with better fees. That said, Concreit may be the better fit if you specifically need non-accredited investors seeking passive real estate exposure through a regulate.
For most investors exploring alternatives, we recommend starting with Groundfloor — but consider your specific goals before committing.
FAQ
Is Groundfloor or Concreit better for beginners?
Concreit is generally more beginner-friendly with its $1 minimum investment compared to Groundfloor's $10.
Can I use both Groundfloor and Concreit?
Yes. Many alternative investment portfolios benefit from diversification across platforms. Groundfloor and Concreit overlap in some asset classes but may offer different deal structures, fee models, and investment approaches.
Which platform has better returns?
Historical returns vary by specific investment and time period. Groundfloor has a higher overall rating, but past performance doesn't guarantee future results. Both platforms provide different risk-return profiles depending on the specific offerings you choose.
Are Groundfloor and Concreit safe?
Both platforms are legitimate, regulated investment services. Groundfloor is regulated by SEC. Concreit is regulated by SEC (Registered Investment Adviser - RIA). As with all alternative investments, there is inherent risk — these are generally illiquid, long-term investments and not FDIC insured.
Concreit Asset Classes
Groundfloor Asset Classes
Concreit
Pros
- +Extremely low minimum investment ($1 to start)
- +Weekly dividend payouts (up to 6.6% annual yield)
- +Non-accredited investors can participate
- +Mobile-first, user-friendly app with live chat support
Cons
- −Fully illiquid investment with 2-4 week redemption timeline
- −No secondary market for trading shares
- −Lower returns compared to alternatives (6-7% vs 8-10%+ elsewhere)
- −1% management fee for accounts over $5,000
Groundfloor
Pros
- +Very low minimum investment ($10) makes it accessible to all investors
- +No accreditation required - open to non-accredited investors
- +SEC-qualified Regulation A offering provides regulatory oversight
- +Strong historical returns averaging 10% annualized since 2013
Cons
- −Illiquid investment with limited secondary market
- −Loss ratio of less than 1% indicates real default risk exists
- −Flywheel Portfolio charges 1.00% management fee on disbursements
- −Interest rates on loans subject to market changes
Disclaimer: ModernAlts is an independent research platform. We may receive compensation from platforms we review. Nothing on this site constitutes investment, legal, or tax advice. Alternative investments involve risk including possible loss of principal. Past performance is not indicative of future results.