AcreTrader vs FarmTogether
Side-by-side comparison to help you decide which platform is right for your portfolio.
| Feature | AcreTrader | FarmTogether |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating | 3.5✓ | 3.3 |
| Min. Investment | $10K✓ | $15K |
| Fee Rating | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| Liquidity | Illiquid | Illiquid |
| Accreditation | Required | Required |
| Ease of Use | 4.0✓ | 3.0 |
| Transparency | 3.8✓ | 2.5 |
| Secondary Market | No | No |
| Mobile App | Yes | No |
AcreTrader Overview
AcreTrader is best suited for investors who want accredited investors seeking diversified farmland exposure through a passive online platform, with moderate to long-term investment horizon and comfort with illiquid assets. The platform, AcreTrader has built a growing investor base.
With a minimum investment of $10K, AcreTrader requires accredited investor status. The platform does not currently offer a secondary market and requires manual investment selection.
Key Strengths:
- Low minimum investment compared to direct farmland ($10,000+)
- Passive investment - AcreTrader handles all farm management and operations
- Strong historical returns (6-14% annually on permanent crops, IRRs reaching 30%+ in some cases)
- Diversification across multiple properties and crop types
Key Drawbacks:
- Requires accredited investor status (net worth or income restrictions)
- Illiquid investment - long hold periods typical
- Relatively new platform with most offerings not yet at end of hold period - limited full-cycle performance data
FarmTogether Overview
FarmTogether is best suited for investors who want accredited investors seeking long-term farmland exposure with moderate to high returns, comfortable with 5-12 year holding periods and illiquid investments. The platform, FarmTogether has built a growing investor base.
With a minimum investment of $15K, FarmTogether requires accredited investor status. The platform does not currently offer a secondary market and requires manual investment selection.
Key Strengths:
- Low minimum investment for accredited investors ($15,000 for crowdfunded offerings)
- Diversified farmland portfolio across multiple regions and crop types
- Professional management of farm operations and property maintenance
- Potential returns of 7-13% after fees on most offerings
Key Drawbacks:
- Accreditation requirement limits access to only qualified investors
- High liquidity constraints with holding periods of 5-12 years
- Limited transparency on historical performance; platform relies on forward-looking projections
Head-to-Head Comparison
Fees & Costs
AcreTrader carries a fee rating of 2.5/5, with fees structured as: 0.75% annual servicing fee; 2-5% upfront closing costs; Performance: 5% upon sale of shares. FarmTogether scores 2.5/5 on fees, charging: 1-2% annual; Performance: 5% net operating income (permanent crop) or 20% gross rent (row crop).
Edge: Tie. Both platforms offer comparable fee structures.
Minimum Investment
AcreTrader requires $10K to get started, while FarmTogether requires $15K. AcreTrader's lower minimum makes it more accessible for new investors.
Edge: AcreTrader. Lower barrier to entry.
Accreditation Requirements
AcreTrader requires accreditation. FarmTogether requires accreditation.
Edge: Tie. Similar accreditation requirements.
Liquidity
AcreTrader offers illiquid investments. FarmTogether provides illiquid investments.
Edge: Tie. Similar liquidity profiles.
Ease of Use & Platform Experience
AcreTrader scores 4.0/5 for ease of use and offers a mobile app. FarmTogether scores 3.0/5.
Edge: AcreTrader. Better overall user experience.
Transparency & Reporting
AcreTrader earns a 3.8/5 transparency rating. FarmTogether scores 2.5/5.
Edge: AcreTrader. More transparent reporting and disclosures.
Who Should Choose AcreTrader?
AcreTrader is the better choice if you:
- Are comfortable with a $10K minimum investment
- Meet accredited investor requirements and want premium deal flow
- Want exposure to diversified real estate portfolios
- Prefer to hand-pick your investments
Who Should Choose FarmTogether?
FarmTogether is the better choice if you:
- Are comfortable with a $15K minimum investment
- Meet accredited investor requirements and want institutional-quality deals
- Want exposure to specific real estate deals or projects
- Prefer to hand-pick your investments
Verdict
Winner: AcreTrader. With 3.5/5 overall rating versus FarmTogether's 3.3/5, AcreTrader edges ahead with a lower minimum investment and a stronger overall package. That said, FarmTogether may be the better fit if you specifically need accredited investors seeking long-term farmland exposure with moderate to high r.
For most investors exploring alternatives, we recommend starting with AcreTrader — but consider your specific goals before committing.
FAQ
Is AcreTrader or FarmTogether better for beginners?
AcreTrader is generally more beginner-friendly with its $10K minimum investment compared to FarmTogether's $15K.
Can I use both AcreTrader and FarmTogether?
Yes. Many alternative investment portfolios benefit from diversification across platforms. AcreTrader and FarmTogether overlap in some asset classes but may offer different deal structures, fee models, and investment approaches.
Which platform has better returns?
Historical returns vary by specific investment and time period. AcreTrader has a higher overall rating, but past performance doesn't guarantee future results. Both platforms provide different risk-return profiles depending on the specific offerings you choose.
Are AcreTrader and FarmTogether safe?
Both platforms are legitimate, regulated investment services. AcreTrader is regulated by SEC (Regulation D Rule 506(c)), FINRA, SIPC. FarmTogether is regulated by SEC (Exempt Reporting Adviser, CRD # 304511, SEC # 802-117227). As with all alternative investments, there is inherent risk — these are generally illiquid, long-term investments and not FDIC insured.
AcreTrader Asset Classes
FarmTogether Asset Classes
AcreTrader
Pros
- +Low minimum investment compared to direct farmland ($10,000+)
- +Passive investment - AcreTrader handles all farm management and operations
- +Strong historical returns (6-14% annually on permanent crops, IRRs reaching 30%+ in some cases)
- +Diversification across multiple properties and crop types
Cons
- −Requires accredited investor status (net worth or income restrictions)
- −Illiquid investment - long hold periods typical
- −Relatively new platform with most offerings not yet at end of hold period - limited full-cycle performance data
- −Multiple fee layers (0.75% annual + 5% on sale + 2-5% upfront closing costs) erode returns
FarmTogether
Pros
- +Low minimum investment for accredited investors ($15,000 for crowdfunded offerings)
- +Diversified farmland portfolio across multiple regions and crop types
- +Professional management of farm operations and property maintenance
- +Potential returns of 7-13% after fees on most offerings
Cons
- −Accreditation requirement limits access to only qualified investors
- −High liquidity constraints with holding periods of 5-12 years
- −Limited transparency on historical performance; platform relies on forward-looking projections
- −Complex fee structure with multiple fee components reducing net returns
Disclaimer: ModernAlts is an independent research platform. We may receive compensation from platforms we review. Nothing on this site constitutes investment, legal, or tax advice. Alternative investments involve risk including possible loss of principal. Past performance is not indicative of future results.